Skip to main content
A Singapore Government Agency Website How to identify
Official website links end with .gov.sg
Secure websites use HTTPS
Look for a lock () or https:// as an added precaution. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
[Scam Alert] Be aware of email impersonating URA, requesting for payment of parking fines.

We will NEVER ask you to transfer money or disclose bank log-in details over a phone call, letter, email or text message.

Call the 24/7 ScamShield (opens in new tab) Helpline at 1799 if you are unsure if something is a scam.

Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA)
Circulars

Revised Method Of Levying Civil Penalty For Retention Of Unauthorised Works Or Use For Non-Conservation Developments

Tags

General

3 August 2009

Circular No : URA/PB/2009/18-DCG
Our Ref : DC/ADMIN/CIRCULAR/PB_09
Fax : 6227 4792

CIRCULAR TO PROFESSIONAL INSTITUTES

Who Should Know:
Property owners, developers, business operators and Qualified Persons (QP)

Effective Date:
With effect from 3 August 2009

Objective

To inform the industry of the revised method of levying civil penalty for non-conservation developments.

Background

  1. Under Section 34 of the Planning Act (Cap 232, 1998 Edition), unauthorised works/ uses that comply with planning requirements may be given planning permission subject to the payment of civil penalty up to a maximum of 50 times the processing fee or $150,000 (whichever is lower).

  2. Currently, the civil penalty levied for non-conservation development is differentiated by enforcement records and application type (ie: Change of use, Additions & alterations). For unauthorised retention of new erection and reconstruction of buildings, a civil penalty up to 25 times the processing fees or $150,000 (whichever is lower) may be imposed. (Refer to Circular No. URA/PB/2003/42-DCD dated 1 Dec 2003).

  3. The current civil penalty guidelines do not take into consideration the extent of unauthorised works to be retained. As it is equitable to calibrate civil penalty according to the amount of unauthorised works to be retained so that it can act effectively as a deterrent, URA has reviewed the civil penalty guidelines.

3-tier Band Civil Penalty

  1. Under the revised guidelines, the civil penalty levied will be dependent on the amount of unauthorised retention works based on the 3 bands below (see Table 1). The guiding principle is that the greater the extent of unauthorized works to be retained, the higher the civil penalty levied. It will apply to all development application types.

Table 1 - 3-tier band civil penalty

Band

Total floor area occupied by unauthorised retention works

Civil Penalty Fees to be Imposed
(as multiple of Processing Fee)

a. Without enforcement
records

b. With enforcement
record 

I 

0m2 to ≤ 50m2*

1x

2x

II

50m2 to ≤ 150m2

4x

8x

III

>150m2

6x

12x

For cases involving applicant trying to deceive the authorities (eg: by concealing works during inspections) regardless of extent of retention works **

Up to 25 X or $150,000 whichever is lower

* Civil penalty imposed for Change of Use cases & cases granted on Temporary Permission will be classified under Band I.
** Actual amount of civil penalty shall be determined by the Competent Authority, taking into account the circumstances of the case.

  1. Unauthorised retention works is measured and defined as the total floor area occupied by the unauthorized retention works. Structures such as car porches and pavilions which are currently exempted from GFA will be counted as part of the unauthorised floor area to be retained for the purposes of computing the civil penalty.

  2. Civil penalty for change of use applications will be classified under Band I. Similarly, for retention cases which can be granted on temporary permission, civil penalty will be levied based on Band I regardless of the extent of unauthorized retention works due to the temporary duration.

  3. For retention cases where URA is of the view that applicants were trying to deceive the authorities (eg. by concealing works during inspections or submission of false documents), a higher civil penalty of up to 25 times the processing fees or $150,000 (whichever is lower) will be imposed regardless of the extent of retention works. The circumstances and severity of the case will be taken into account when deciding on the actual amount of civil penalty to be imposed.

Implementation

  1. The revised guidelines on civil penalty will apply to all new development applications [involving civil penalty] which are received on or after the date of this circular.

  2. For submission purposes, the unauthorised works to be retained should be separately demarcated and the floor area clearly reflected on plans for our consideration.

  3. This circular supersedes our previous Circular No. URA/PB/2003/42-DCD dated 1 Dec 2003.

  4. I would appreciate it if you could convey the contents of this circular to the relevant members of your organisation. If you or your members have any queries concerning this circular, please do not hesitate to call our DCG Enquiry Line at Tel: 6223 4811 or e-mail us at ura_dcd@ura.gov.sg (opens in new tab). We would be pleased to answer queries on this, and any other development control matter. For your information, the past circulars to the professional institutes are available from our website http://www.ura.gov.sg (opens in new tab).

Thank You.

HAN YONG HOE
GROUP DIRECTOR (DEVELOPMENT CONTROL)
for CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY