| Q1 |
 |
With
reference to Clause 6.2.4 of the TCOT, the exclusive use
of the space (16m into sale site boundary) and period
required to complete the CST work (1st Quarter 2008 to
end 2nd Quarter 2009) is quite substantial and this will
greatly affect the construction work and completion date
of the development. Therefore, we would like to seek
your clarification on whether the successful bidder be
allowed to hand over the area required by CST in parts
after the completion of sub-structural works at this
area instead.
|
|
| A1 |
 |
The
successful bidder will not be allowed to handover the
area required for CST works in parts. However, as stated
in Clause 6.2.4 of the Technical Conditions of Tender,
the 16m wide working space will not be required for the
entire duration of the CST construction. The CST
contractor is expected to remove the hoarding and vacate
the 16.0m wide working area within Land Parcel B by the
end of 2nd Quarter 2009 when the installation of the
temporary works is expected to be completed. However,
this indicative period of between 1st Quarter 2008 to
2nd Quarter 2009 for the use of CST working space is
based on the assumption that the installation of
temporary works can proceed as scheduled without
complications. In the event that there are unforeseen
circumstances which complicates the installation of the
temporary works, the successful tenderer is to allow the
CST contractor exclusive use and occupation of the
working space until the temporary works are completed.
Nevertheless,
URA would work with the successful tenderer on the
interfacing of the works before the commencement of CST
works to minimise delays for both parties.
|
|
| Q2 |
 |
Clause
6.2.1 of the Technical Conditions of Tender states that
the Authority is building a CST network to serve the
land parcels at Marina Bay. The construction of the CST
along Marina View is expected to be completed by end of
2011 to serve Land Parcel B. Does it mean that the
essential services (such as chilled water/permanent
power/telecommunication and potable water system) for
TOP will be only available by end of 2011? If not,
please advise when the services will be ready for
connection.
|
|
| A2 |
 |
Yes,
the essential services (such as chilled water/permanent
power/ telecommunication and potable water system) will
be available to serve the development of Land Parcel B
at Marina View by end 2011 when the CST along Marina
View is expected to be completed. The Government will
work together with the successful tenderer during the
development stage of the land parcel to facilitate
timely completion of the CST to provide the essential
services to the development.
|
|
| Q3 |
 |
When
is the targeted completion of the McCallum Street
Extension?
|
|
| A3 |
 |
As
reflected in Clause 4.20.1 of the Technical Conditions
of Tender, the northern part of the McCallum Street
Extension, comprising the carriageway, road side table
and centre median with tree-planting, as shown on the
Control Plans, is to be constructed by the successful
tenderer of Land Parcel B. The southern part of McCallum
Street Extension, comprising the carriageway and road
side table, is planned to be implemented by the
successful tenderer of the adjacent future site and as
such, the timeframe for the construction for this part
of the road is not available yet. The connection of
McCallum Street Extension to Shenton Way will be
implemented when the adjacent Shenton House and UIC
development undergo major A&A works or
redevelopment.
|
|
| Q4 |
 |
What's
the depth of the 8m wide drain (from the structural base
of the drain to the ground level)?
|
|
| A4 |
 |
Based
on PUB's as-built drawings of the 8m wide collector
drain, the depth of the drain within Land Parcel B
ranges between 5.45m to 5.7m. The survey drawings of the
drains are available for viewing by potential tenderers
at the URA Centre, Land Sales Management Section, 13th
storey. You can contact Ms Marie Chia at Tel: 6329 3327
to make the necessary arrangement for viewing. As the
information belongs to PUB, it is strictly for viewing
only and no duplication of the plans is allowed.
|
|
| Q5 |
 |
As
the location for the ventilation shaft shown in the
Control Plan number 8 in the Tender Conditions is only
indicative, can this CST ventilation shaft be located
right at the corner abutting the 3.6m wide covered
walkway (adjacent to the 15.4m wide pedestrian mall) and
the 5m wide covered walkway (along Marina View)?
Alternatively can this ventilation shaft be placed right
next to the vertical pedestrian point (connecting
basement & 1st storey level) at the corner of
McCallum Street Extension and Marina View?
|
|
| A5 |
 |
Yes,
flexibility is given to the successful tenderer and his
appointed Qualified Professional (QP) to relocate the
ventilation shaft-cum-entrance/ exit structure based on
the overall layout of the development, subject to
compliance with the requirements as set out in Clause
6.2.3 of the Technical Conditions of Tender and
evaluation of the detailed design treatment of the
structure, in relation to the proposed layout of the
uses, public spaces and pedestrian routes within the
development. However, we wish to reiterate that the
location of the services connection to the development
at the CST Junction Box at J3A-1 is fixed and cannot be
relocated. Hence, the position of the CST ventilation
shaft-cum-entrance / exit structure at V3A-1 is
indicatively shown on the Control Plans as being
adjacent to the Junction Box as this represents the
shortest connection point.
At the
development application stage, the successful tenderer
and his appointed QP are required to provide detailed
M&E drawings showing all the mechanical, electrical
and other facilities affected by the relocation of the
CST vent shaft cum entrance/ exit structure for our
clearance at the development stage. The successful
developer and his appointed QP are also required to
submit the pressure drop calculation of the extended
vent shaft including the louvers and comply with the
design criteria given by URA. The calculation shall be
duly endorsed by the applicant's QP. As set out in
Clause 6.2.3c of the Technical Conditions of Tender, the
successful tenderer is required to bear all cost and
expense for the design and construction of the
ventilation shaft and entrance/ exit structure within
Land Parcel B to suit the layout of the proposed
development.
|
|
| Q6 |
 |
For
Land Parcel B at Marina View, should the development be
following the parking provision standards specified for
Commercial Site or White Site?
|
|
| A6 |
 |
The
proposed development on Land Parcel B at
Marina
View
is to comply in full with the physical parking
requirements based on the current zoning of the site,
which is White, subject to the prevailing guidelines as
issued by the LTA.
|
|
| Q7 |
 |
Will
shops, F&B outlets, gyms and spas supporting the
hotel operation be considered as GFA under the 25% for
hotel use, or the balance 15% GFA meant for any
Commercial, Hotel or Residential use?
|
|
| A7 |
 |
As
stated in Clause 4.2.2 of the Technical Conditions of
Tender, at least 25% of the maximum permissible GFA of
the development is to be for hotel and hotel related
uses. Based on the Development Control circular issued
on
2 September 2002
, hotel related uses refer to hotel facilities that are
used solely by staying guests or hotel
staff only. As such,
the shops, F&B outlets, gyms and spas if they are
also available to public would be computed as commercial
GFA, outside the 25% quantum for Hotel use. For
the gym and spa, they can be considered as part of
the Hotel GFA if they are facilities used solely by the
hotel staying guests or hotel staff.
|
|
| Q8 |
 |
We
would like to seek clarification on the following:
Scenario
A:
Is
a Trust permitted to submit a tender for the Land Parcel
and will this be subject to conditions? If the tender is
successful, can another Trust be appointed as the
Approved Developer for the Land Parcel and will this be
subject to conditions?
Scenario
B:
If
the successful tenderer is a holding company, can it
appoint a Trust as the Approved Developer for the Land
Parcel and will this be subject to conditions?
|
|
| A8 |
 |
For
Scenario A, a tender for the land parcel may be
submitted by the trustees of the trust on behalf of the
trust. The Authority will only be able to indicate the
exact conditions that may be imposed when full details
relating to the trust are given after the award of the
tender. Generally, the Authority will require the
beneficiaries of the trust (the successful tenderer) as
at the tender submission date to hold a controlling
interest of more than 50% share in the land and the
proposed development until TOP is issued for the whole
of the proposed development on the land.
If the
tender in Scenario A is successful, any proposal by the
successful tenderer (trust) to appoint another trust as
the Approved Developer will be subject to the prior
written approval of the Authority. The Authority will be
able to consider such proposal only when full details
relating to the successful tenderer and the proposed
approved developer are given after the award of the
tender for the land. Generally, the Authority will
consider such proposal with regard to the requirement
that the beneficiaries of the successful tenderer
(trust) as at the tender submission date shall hold a
controlling interest as mentioned above in the land and
the proposed development until TOP is issued for the
whole of the proposed development on the land.
Similarly
for Scenario B, any proposal by the successful tenderer
(Holding Company) to appoint a trust as the Approved
Developer will be subject to the prior written approval
of the Authority. The Authority will be able to consider
such proposal only when full details relating to the
successful tenderer and the proposed approved developer
are given after the award of the tender for the land.
Generally, the Authority will consider such proposal
with regard to the requirement that the shareholders of
the successful tenderer as at the tender submission
date shall hold a
controlling interest as mentioned above in the land and
the proposed development until TOP is issued for the
whole of the proposed development on the land.
|
|
| Q9 |
 |
Based
on the tender documents, Boon Tat Street Extension is
planned as a 2 lane (2 way road), Marina View is planned
as a 2 lane (one way road) and the 15.5m wide local
access road is planned as a 2 lane (2 way road). Please
advise on the direction of the traffic flow at
Marina
View
?
|
|
| A9 |
 |
Marina
View is planned as a 2-lane, one-way (20.4m wide)
primary access road. It will form a one-way pair with
Straits View, which is located on the opposite side of
the Central Linear Park. The traffic direction is
currently planned to be northbound along Marina View and
southbound along Straits View. However, in the interim,
Marina View will operate as a 2-lane, two-way road as
part of the temporary road network until the permanent
road network is in place. Please see attached plan in
Appendix 1.
|
|
| Q10 |
 |
When
will the temporary access road (adjacent to the part of
Boon Tat Street Extension) be ready for use by the
development of Land Parcel A at Marina View for
construction access?
|
|
| A10 |
 |
The
temporary construction access road immediately adjacent
to the part of Boon Tat Street Extension will be built
by the successful tenderer of Land Parcel A to
facilitate the development of Land Parcel A and as such,
the timeframe for the construction of this road is not
available yet. It is intended to be used for access to
Land Parcel A only.
|
|
| Q11 |
 |
Related
to Question 10, can we use the temporary construction
access road adjacent to part of the Boon Tat Street
Extension for construction access to Land Parcel B?
|
|
| A11 |
 |
The
temporary construction access road adjacent to part of
the Boon Tat Street Extension ("the temporary
road") is adjacent to the Downtown Extension
worksite as well as the One Shenton construction works.
Heavy traffic is thus anticipated at this location. Any
shared access to Land Parcel B via the temporary road
will be subject to LTA’s evaluation and approval.
Notwithstanding that, we wish to highlight that the
successful tenderer for Land Parcel B will still be
required to build the temporary construction access road
off the realigned Marina Station Road, as stated in
Clause 7.1.1 of the Technical Conditions of Tender, to
facilitate construction works.
Any
additional construction access to Land Parcel B via the
temporary road to be constructed by the successful
tenderer of Land Parcel A will be subject to approval by
LTA and will be a private arrangement between the
successful tenderers of Land Parcels A and B. We wish to
highlight that this arrangement may have impact on the
construction schedule for Land Parcel A, especially for
the part of the roadworks along Marina View and Boon Tat
Street Extension which will need to be completed within
24 months from the completion of the construction of the
Common Services Tunnels beneath Marina View.
|
|
| Q12 |
 |
What
is the usage, building height and foot print of the
proposed development on the land parcel to the north
east of Land Parcel B in the centre of the park (beside
the Landmark Station)?
|
|
| A12 |
 |
The
site to the southeast of the Landmark Station is
currently zoned as a White site at Gross Plot Ratio of
25.0 under the Master Plan 2003. The technical height
control for the site is currently 245m AMSL. The
detailed planning parameters and urban design
requirements for the site will be reviewed closer to the
time of tender of the site.
|
|
| Q13 |
 |
Please
advise on the TOL fee payment for the construction
access road, sewer connection, CST connection works as
required?
|
|
| A13 |
 |
The TOL
fee payable will be determined by SLA based on the
prevailing market rate at the time of TOL application
and the proposed uses of the State land. Generally, the
TOL rate for construction of access road will be charged
nominal rates of $120 per annum. As for sewer and CST
connections to the main network, SLA advised that since
such infrastructures are essential, right of way will be
given and hence TOL will not be applicable for such
cases.
|
|
| Q14 |
 |
Under
Clause 4.9.2 of the Technical Conditions of Tender (TCOT),
it specifies that up to a maximum of 40% of the length
of the built frontage of the development may be set back
from the site boundary to allow for articulation of the
building form. We would like to clarify whether the
setback is it applicable to the tower block?
|
|
| A14 |
 |
As
stated in Clause 4.9.2 of the TCOT, the development of
Land Parcel B is to be generally built up to the lines
of Road Reserves along Marina View, McCallum Street
Extension and the site boundary fronting onto the
pedestrian mall as shown on the Control Plans. As a
guide, a minimum 19.0m (approximately 4-storey) high
building edge is to be provided. Up to a maximum of 40%
of the length of the built frontage of the development
may be set back from the site boundary to allow for
articulation of the building form.
|
|